This is looking more prima facie axiomatic. 
The text is self-conscious in post-premodern times, centuries better to stay in charge. A common outcome, doubtless — a text’s consequences can be foregrounded in a poet’s identity and her intents, conflated with audience, exploited media, reputation, so forth. It’s all to the good, superficially, temporally — a certain category of problem when one’s success precedes the poem. 



So a critical first question for the poem is, can we start over.

*

Abandon hope, erratic celebrated fuck bunny. You are no one.